

Can
Pooch Come for a Visit in a No-dog Building?
Robert S. Griswold | Steven R. Kellman | Ted Smith
30-March-2003 Sunday
This column on issues confronting renters and landlords is written
by Counselor of Real Estate and
Certified Property Manager Robert Griswold, host of Real
Estate Today! with Robert Griswold (10 a.m.
Saturdays on News Radio 600 KOGO, or on the Internet
at www.retodayradio.com),
and by attorneys Steven R. Kellman, director of the
Tenants' Legal Center, and Ted Smith, principal in a law
firm representing landlords.
QUESTION: I live in an apartment building that only
allows cats, but no dogs. My daughter wants to visit me for two days
and she has a little dog that she must bring with her. My manager says
she can't even have it on the property even if she is just visiting.
Can they do that?
ANSWER: Landlord's attorney Smith: As the
landlord's attorney, I regret to inform you that the no-dog provision
applies to guests and invitees as well. It is not unreasonable to
prohibit pets in the premises.
Further, it is unfair to other residents to allow
your daughter to have a pet, even though it's only for two days. While
I am sure you anticipate no problems, there could barking, snipping,
and other associated problems. Please have your daughter keep her dog
in a kennel for the two-day period.
Tenant's attorney Kellman: Put the dog in a
kennel and miss the visit? I do not think so. Heck, dogs have
feelings, too. A rule stating that your daughter's dog cannot even set
one paw on the property, even to visit, seems abusive and unlawful to
me.
Clearly, under certain conditions, a no-dog
provision in a lease can be a valid restriction regarding dogs
residing in the unit. Such a provision should not restrict an invitee
from bringing their dog for a short visit.
The first amendment to the U.S. Constitution
guarantees us the freedom of association. Telling you that your
daughter cannot bring her dog on a two-day visit seriously impacts
that freedom. It is like saying, since you have a dog and wish to
travel with it, do not visit here at all, you are not welcome.
Why stop there? How about saying that anyone with
insufficient credit to qualify for residency cannot visit either?
While landlords wish to minimize the costs associated with ordinary
wear and tear in their buildings, restrictive policies may not be so
unreasonable as to strip tenants of their rights. I think your
daughter should be able to visit any time she pleases with or without
her dog.
Surly tenant
Question: We own a rental home and rent out several
rooms. One of the tenants just moved in last month and signed a
six-month lease that requires him to pay first month, last month and a
security deposit. He couldn't pay the entire security deposit or any
of last month's rent upon move-in but said he'd pay the rest of the
security deposit and the last month's rent in two weeks.
We eventually got the last month's rent from him
over two months after move-in. He then promised to pay the balance of
the security deposit. This tenant has lied to us a number of times,
and has now become surly when we ask him for the deposit.
Since we now have a last month's rent from him, at
what point can we consider him to be in breach of the lease and give
him a 30-day notice?
Landlord's attorney Smith: Your tenant is in
violation of the lease agreement under which he holds possession of
the premises. The lease violations you refer to subject the tenant to
possible eviction.
However, you may not use a 30-day notice. The
30-day is used to terminate month-to-month tenancies only, not leases.
In this case you have a six-month lease. You will need to serve a
three-day notice to perform or quit which requests payment of the
balance of the deposit or possession of the premises within three days
after service.
If he fails to comply with the three-day notice,
you will have the right to evict despite the six-month lease. Your
retention of the last month's rent should not defeat your right to
evict based on the lease violation.
In residential cases, I encourage my landlord
clients to get away from collecting last month's rent, and, instead,
call the entire amount held security deposit. This gives you your
maximum use of the money for rent, cleaning, and damages. By calling
the entire sum a security deposit, you are not required to give credit
against rent before the tenant vacates.
Safety issues
Question: Is it safe for a single woman to be
living in an apartment near downtown? If I take the place, I will have
a garage space lighted by dusk-to-dawn lights. Another benefit is that
it is on the second floor. Can you offer any advice?
Property Manager Griswold: You ask an
excellent question, but it is one only you can answer. Your safety is
your responsibility and it sounds like you have already considered
certain factors.
However, I can offer some additional points to
consider but ultimately it is your call. I would suggest that you
speak with other tenants currently living at the property. You should
also spend some time at various hours at the subject property and in
and about the neighborhood and local businesses to see what the
property is like. Just visiting the property during the middle of the
day can be deceptive and not offer a true picture of the potential
dangers that may be more prevalent after dark or on weekends.
It is also an excellent idea to contact your local
law enforcement department. However, law enforcement can only give you
statistics and they cannot give specific recommendations but the
information may help you determine if you feel comfortable. When you
are at the law enforcement office, for a nominal fee you can receive
information from the Megan's Law database that contains information
about registered sex offenders in that area.
Naturally, you should always do your best to be
safe and minimize any risks by being careful, alert and using sound
judgment. Remember, only you can decide if you feel that a certain
rental property is "safe," so don't move in unless you are
completely satisfied with the results of your investigation into the
property and the surrounding area.
IF
YOU'RE A TENANT OR LANDLORD, the authors stand ready to
answer your questions in this column, although letters
cannot be answered individually. Write them at: Rental
Roundtable, Homes Section, San Diego Union-Tribune, P.O.
Box 120191, San Diego, CA, 92112-0191. Or you may e-mail
them at rgriswold.sdut@retodayradio.com
Copyright Union-Tribune
Publishing Co.
Back to
2003 Rental Roundtable
Index
Robert Griswold and the Real Estate
Today! radio show strongly support the intent and the letter of all federal and
state fair housing laws. As a reminder to all owners and managers of real
estate, note that all real estate advertised is subject to the Federal Fair
Housing Act, which makes it illegal to advertise "any preference,
limitation, discrimination because of race, color, national origin or ancestry, religion, sex,
physical disability, or familial status, or intention to make any such
preference, limitation or discrimination." Additional state and/or local
fair housing laws may also apply. Be sure to inform all persons that all
dwellings offered or advertised are on an equal opportunity basis.

Revised and Updated -
Wednesday, April 26, 2006
Robert S. Griswold, CRE, CPM, CCIM,
PCAM, GRI, ARM
Griswold Corporate Center
Griswold Real Estate Management, Inc.
5703 Oberlin Drive, Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92121-1743
Phone: (858) 597-6100
Fax: (858) 597-6161
Email: rgriswold.ret@retodayradio.com
©2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996 Robert S. Griswold.
All Rights Reserved.
http://www.retodayradio.com
|