

Tenant
is Stuck With Month-to-Month Lease
Robert S. Griswold | Steven R. Kellman | Ted Smith
2-March-2003 Sunday
This column on issues confronting renters and landlords is written
by Counselor of Real Estate and
Certified Property Manager Robert Griswold, host of Real
Estate Today! with Robert Griswold (9 a.m.
Saturdays on AM1130 - KSDO radio, or on the Internet
at www.retodayradio.com),
and by attorneys Steven R. Kellman, director of the
Tenants' Legal Center, and Ted Smith, principal in a law
firm representing landlords.
QUESTION: A few months ago I had a nine-month lease
that expired. It stated: "Unless written notice is given by
Lessor to Lessee or by Lessee to Lessor at least (30) days prior to
the expiration of this Lease, then this Lease shall automatically
renew for (1) month periods (month-to-month) until written notice is
given by one party to the other not less than 30 days prior to the end
of any one month."
Approximately 45 days before my lease expired the
management company sent me a letter with different lease terms and
rents. The longer the term, the lower the monthly rent. I had to let
them know by the end of that month what I was going to do.
I did nothing and I am on a month-to-month basis.
Now I want to take advantage of their offer for a longer-term lease at
the lower rental rate but they say I'm committed to a month-to-month
lease. Can I make them offer the long-term lease? If not, I want to
move but they tell me that I can only give my 30-day notice at the end
of the month.
ANSWER: Property Manager Griswold: Unfortunately, you cannot force
the landlord to offer the same lease terms at this time. So I would
say you are stuck with a month-to-month rental agreement since you did
not give them a notice or accept/reject their options in writing at
least 30 days before the end of your lease.
But that may not be all that bad. In many areas,
the rental rates have actually fallen in the past several months and
you should be able to negotiate a better deal. There are even
landlords offering rent concessions or waiving the rental application
fees.
If you decide you want to move soon, then you
should immediately give them a 30-day written notice of termination of
your tenancy. There is no requirement that you can only give a notice
to terminate your tenancy at any certain time period so you could give
your notice tomorrow and legally have the right to vacate in 30 days.
If you do this, be sure to only pay the prorated
rent at the beginning of the next month or they may claim that you
invalidated your own notice.
Mom's friend
Question: My mother invited a "friend"
who was down and out to stay with her while she got herself back on
her feet. The friend turned out to be an extremely unethical,
manipulative woman who is now refusing to move out of my mother's home
after staying there for almost a year without paying any rent.
My mother has asked her to leave and she has
blatantly said no. I want to know if she has any tenant rights. She
has never signed a lease or paid rent money.
I would like to have the police department remove
the woman. This is a very distressing situation so I would appreciate
any help that you can give me.
Landlords' attorney Smith: This is a tough
question. From a legal standpoint, it is difficult to characterize the
type of tenancy the manipulative friend has in the house. She is
neither a month-to-month tenant nor a leaseholder, having never paid
rent or executed any written agreement. On the other hand, she is not
a trespasser, having obtained consensual possession originally.
Landlord/tenant law would describe her occupancy of
the house as a tenancy-at-will. This type of tenancy may be terminated
by written 30-day notice followed by the eviction lawsuit. As an
alternative, I would suggest that the reader's mother consider
obtaining a restraining order removing the woman from the house as an
alternative to an eviction. California's elder-abuse law and family
codes provide for kick-out orders in situations similar to this.
Tenants' attorney Kellman: I agree with Ted
that this woman is probably a tenant- at-will and, as such, her
tenancy may be terminated with a 30-day notice followed by an eviction
court case if she refuses to move. Take care, however, because if she
claims to pay rent with services or other things of value, she may not
be a tenant-at-will at all.
In that case, she would be a month-to-month tenant
and be entitled to a 60-day notice once she is there a year. There is
an exception to the court eviction rule. If your mother is the owner
of the home, and this woman is the only boarder at the home, she may
be evicted by the police without having to go to court. You would
serve her a 30-day notice and if she does not leave, call the police.
They could then remove her as a trespasser.
Restraining orders are not favored by the courts as
an eviction tool. That procedure is reserved to prevent violence or
other serious threatening or harassing conduct.
Where there's smoke
Question: We rent a three-bedroom, multilevel house
in Pacific Beach. The neighbor "upwind" from the house has
an older, one-story home with a fireplace and chimney that is below
the level of the bedroom windows on our house.
On cool days and evenings, he burns magazines and
newspapers in the fireplace, and the reeking, full smoke comes right
into our house; it seeps in even when the windows are closed. After
complaining to our landlord, he called San Diego County air pollution
control. They told him there was nothing they could legally do to stop
the neighbor from creating this awful smoke, but offered to mail the
neighbor a pamphlet about how to use a fireplace.
The neighbor is a renter -- can we complain to his
landlord or what should we do?
Landlords' attorney Smith: I sympathize with
your situation. However, your landlord is not in control of the
neighboring property, which is under separate ownership. This limits
what your landlord can or should do for you regarding the noxious
fumes from the adjacent chimney.
Both of you should take action against the
neighboring landlord and the tenant. The smoke constitutes a nuisance
and interference with your quiet enjoyment. Write a letter to both the
tenant and landlord requesting that this be stopped. If they fail to
comply then consider further legal proceedings.
Tenants' attorney Kellman: The landlord must
supply you with a dwelling free of significant defects affecting
habitability and, as Ted points out, free from interference with your
use and quiet enjoyment of the rental. While it is true that the
neighbor is the main cause of this smoke problem, you should not have
to hold your breath waiting for a solution.
It is the landlord who must resolve this matter.
You, as a tenant, are entitled to expect the rental to be in a safe
and habitable condition. The fact that the landlord's building is
facing difficulties with adjoining properties is his problem, not
yours.
In residential rental situations, tenants do not
need to worry about such things as who made those leaky pipes, where
did those frayed wires come from or, in this case, why do the
neighbors send their smoke your way.
If it is a problem not caused by the tenant, it is
one which should be fixed by the landlord. He did make some effort to
resolve the matter, but that has not been successful. If legal action
is now needed to stop the smoke, it is up to your landlord to handle
it at his or her expense, not yours.
You are probably entitled to a partial rent offset
(i.e. refund) for having to live like that until the problem is
resolved.
IF
YOU'RE A TENANT OR LANDLORD, the authors stand ready to
answer your questions in this column, although letters
cannot be answered individually. Write them at: Rental
Roundtable, Homes Section, San Diego Union-Tribune, P.O.
Box 120191, San Diego, CA, 92112-0191. Or you may e-mail
them at rgriswold.sdut@retodayradio.com
Copyright Union-Tribune
Publishing Co.
Back to
2003 Rental Roundtable
Index
Robert Griswold and the Real Estate
Today! radio show strongly support the intent and the letter of all federal and
state fair housing laws. As a reminder to all owners and managers of real
estate, note that all real estate advertised is subject to the Federal Fair
Housing Act, which makes it illegal to advertise "any preference,
limitation, discrimination because of race, color, national origin or ancestry, religion, sex,
physical disability, or familial status, or intention to make any such
preference, limitation or discrimination." Additional state and/or local
fair housing laws may also apply. Be sure to inform all persons that all
dwellings offered or advertised are on an equal opportunity basis.

Revised and Updated -
Wednesday, April 26, 2006
Robert S. Griswold, CRE, CPM, CCIM,
PCAM, GRI, ARM
Griswold Corporate Center
Griswold Real Estate Management, Inc.
5703 Oberlin Drive, Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92121-1743
Phone: (858) 597-6100
Fax: (858) 597-6161
Email: rgriswold.ret@retodayradio.com
©2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996 Robert S. Griswold.
All Rights Reserved.
http://www.retodayradio.com
|